[Free] [Server] Which license to use?

Chris Allen mrchrisallen at gmail.com
Mon Sep 19 08:33:24 PDT 2005


Hey guys,

I'm suggesting Skype for the meeting. Eventually once the server is up and 
running, we can build a client for it and use that as our meeting 
application. What a cool first project for Red5!

IRC sounds cool to though Marcos, I will try it out.

-Chris

On 9/19/05, . m a r c o s a u g u s t o <chadart at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I made up
> #red5 on irc.freenode.net <http://irc.freenode.net>
> 
> I think irc is better too, we can let open.. and check when we are
> working on it.....
> 
> 
> On 19 Sep 2005 14:58:17 -0000, grant at bluetube.com <grant at bluetube.com> 
> wrote:
> > please, something other than MSN.... yahoo or AOL IM pretty please :)
> >
> > Grant
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: john grden neoriley at gmail.com
> > To: mrchrisallen at gmail.com, Free at osflash.org
> > Sent: 9/18/05 10:00 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Free] [Server] Which license to use?
> >
> > > any day after monday would be fine if we'ere doing 10.30am EST again
> > >
> > > On 9/18/05, Chris Allen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Luke,
> > > >
> > > > Let's make this the main topic of our next chat meeting. I agree 
> that it
> > > > needs to be decided soon.
> > > >
> > > > So with that in mind, when is a good time fore everyone? I will 
> tryand
> > > > organize it again.
> > > >
> > > > -Chris
> > > >
> > > > On 9/18/05, Luke Hubbard (luke at codegent.com)
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Guys..
> > > > > I'm amazed by the code Yannik just sent through. I think we would 
> have
> > > > > got there (working prototype) soon but this gives us a major boost 
> in
> > > > > understanding the protocol.
> > > > > As we may soon release some code I wanted to start the discussions 
> on
> > > > > which license to release under. My personal preference is Apache / 
> BSD style
> > > > > license as this places the least restriction on who / where the 
> code can be
> > > > > used. I noticed Yannik choose the GNU Library General Public 
> License for his
> > > > > ruby implementation, IMHO this might be too restrictive for the 
> Java
> > > > > version.
> > > > > BSD, Apache, LGPL, GPL, Other?
> > > > > Anyway.. what do people think?
> > > > > -- luke
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Free mailing list
> > > > > Free at osflash.org
> > > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/free_osflash.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Free mailing list
> > > > Free at osflash.org
> > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/free_osflash.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > John Grden - Blitz
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Free mailing list
> > > Free at osflash.org
> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/free_osflash.org
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Free mailing list
> > Free at osflash.org
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/free_osflash.org
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> . m a r c o s a u g u s t o ;
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Free mailing list
> Free at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/free_osflash.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/free_osflash.org/attachments/20050919/be34577b/attachment.htm


More information about the Free mailing list