[osflash] Sreenweaver : WAS Legal Considerations That Concern Us All

[Tim Walling]

Screenweaver also offers up the option of including the .ocx file when
packaging up your program.

Tim


On 10/26/05, Stefan Richter < stefan at flashcomguru.com> wrote:
>
> Can't comment on Screenweaver but Zinc has the option of packaging the
> plugin or relying on the one that's installed.
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: osflash-bounces at osflash.org [mailto: osflash-bounces at osflash.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of Mike Chambers
> > Sent: 26 October 2005 16:15
> > To: Open Source Flash Mailing List
> > Subject: [osflash] Sreenweaver : WAS Legal Considerations That Concern
> Us
> > All
> >
> > First of all, if you need input from Macromedia on something, then
> > posting to a blog is not necessarily the best way to get it. For
> > example, I had never seen the post below.
> >
> > Second, do Screenweaver projects actually embed the player? (sorry if
> > that is a simple qustion, but I havent used Screenweaver).
> >
> > mike chambers
> >
> >
> >
> > Edwin van Rijkom wrote:
> > > Stefan Richter wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>It's up to Macromedia/Adobe to lay out the rules for the game. Having
> > the
> > >>referee play on one of the teams doesn't make much of a great sport
> and
> > >>leaves the other side wondering if it's worth playing at all.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > Playing the game will be very worthwhile if it turns out that the
> > > referee realizes that his target is to make the sport more populair,
> to
> > > the benifit of all players and the audience.
> > >
> > > I wish he would erect the perimeter fence - I'm asking for that
> > > explicitly (see:
> > > http://www.vanrijkom.org/archives/2005/08/licensed_to_fla.html)<http://www.vanrijkom.org/archives/2005/08/licensed_to_fla.html%29>but it
> > > seems to be half-time.
> > >
> > > IMHO this could all be cleared up if someone for each 'disputable'
> > > project would simply contact Macromedia formaly and ask if a license
> is
> > > required. If so, why not simply ask Macromedia if such a license can
> be
> > > granted?
> > >
> > > If the answer is 'no' than that would be very disapointing, but it is
> > > better to know sooner than later. At least it would put an end to all
> > > uncertainties.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Edwin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > osflash mailing list
> > > osflash at osflash.org
> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > osflash mailing list
> > osflash at osflash.org
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>



--

---
Tim
timwalling.com <http://timwalling.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/osflash_osflash.org/attachments/20051026/a51f19cf/attachment.htm