[osflash] red 5 and ressources
Chris Allen
mrchrisallen at gmail.com
Fri Jul 7 10:17:30 EDT 2006
Hi Raph,
A new version of the server with completely refactored streaming code
will be out soon as well. It should perform better than 0.4. Anyway,
sign up for the red5 mailing list for notification about its release.
-Chris
On 7/7/06, Raphaël ARBUZ <raphaelarbuz at netcourrier.com> wrote:
>
>
> I'w be running as well so it seems like that would do the trick!
>
> Thanks a lot for your help.
>
> Raph
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: network congestion
> To: Open Source Flash Mailing List
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 2:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [osflash] red 5 and ressources
>
> On a Celeron 2.4Ghz server with 1GB RAM and a 10Mbps connection (running
> Centos 4.3 Linux), I added the red5 server process from the 0.4 tarball.
> Aside from the bandwidth it consumes relaying connections, you'd hardly know
> it was there. On the other hand, if you're running all that stuff on a
> Windows box, you're on your own.
>
> Network Congestion
> networkcongestion at gmail.com
>
>
>
> On 7/7/06, Raphaël ARBUZ < raphaelarbuz at netcourrier.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi to all of you.
> >
> > I'm thinking about installing red 5 on my server machine. the thing is
> that my machine (2.6 GHz, 512Mo) already runs Apache and MySQL so I was
> wondering how much ressources red 5 would use and if that wouldn't slow down
> my whole server.
> >
> > Thank you very much for any help!
> >
> > Raphael
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > osflash mailing list
> > osflash at osflash.org
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
>
More information about the osflash
mailing list