[osflash] FLA2MXML per JSFL - any thoughts?

[John Grden]

exactly, the original discussion was FLA>mxml

And we can't just assume RIA developement when we get to the FLA part of the
scenario.  Seems more and more people are forgetting that we still develop
experience sites in the Flash world - it's not always an RIA/main static
class/mtasc solution.  In fact, that's a very small portion of the work I do
and I use all of these tools just like anyone else.

We have timelines/animations/assets to deal with still and that's the real
problem with converting from FLA to MXML.  How do you accomadate all the
possibilities?

On 7/11/06, Chris Allen <mrchrisallen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/11/06, Martin Wood <flashdev at relivethefuture.com> wrote:
> >
> > Luke Hubbard wrote:
> > > So if your idea is FLA -> SWF -> MXML then
> > > perhaps
> > > look at swfmill I think it can convert a SWF to xml too. Im not
> totally
> > > sure I get why, but then who am I to question those with will. Do it
> for the fun
> > > of it.
> >
> > why? one reason is that it allows you to do
> >
> > swf -> xml -> xslt -> xml -> swf kind of transforms
> >
> > also when figuring out the xml required to input to swfmill to create
> particular
> > things its been a lot easier for me to generate a swf from mtasc /
> flash, turn
> > it into xml and then use that as a template for generating the xml i
> need on the
> > server, which is then turned into a new swf. if you follow me :)
> >
> >
> I think Luke was referring to the concept of FLA -> MXML in general.
> But, I could be wrong.
>
> -Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>



-- 
John Grden
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/osflash_osflash.org/attachments/20060711/dffa76a9/attachment.htm