[osflash] FLA2MXML per JSFL - any thoughts?

[Martin Wood]

Chris Allen wrote:
> That's true John, but I like the idea of using a SWF and SWFMill as
> that means it can be run from the command line and doesn't require
> that the SWF be created with the IDE, or that the IDE be open with the
> FLA. SWFMill will generate an XML output of the SWF, so it might be as
> easy as a simple XSLT transformation to MXML. I'm also pretty certain
> that the reverse can be done with SWFMill as well. So XML -> SWFMill
> -> SWF would also be possible. Unfortunately that doesn't get you an
> FLA though.
> 
> Anyway, I'm with Luke on this one; it does seem like a weird thing to
> do. Maybe I will understand more of the advantage once it's built
> though.

oh he was asking why fla 2 mxml? not why swf -> xml ?

if so, i also dont really see the advantage, but if it keeps someone off the 
streets and out of danger it cant hurt :)