[osflash] [ANN] Aptana IDE for AFLAX...

[Arnoud Bos]

Hi Paul, 

 

I played a bit with aptana and i must say: Really impressive!!

So, I'm changing from Homesite to Aptana for (D)HTML, AJAX development right
away.

 

One small remark is that the welcome screen doesn't load the
stylesheet/images.

 

See:

 



 

 

Thanx for sharing such a nice tool!

 

Arnoud

 

 

 

 

 

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: osflash-bounces at osflash.org [mailto:osflash-bounces at osflash.org] Namens
Paul Colton
Verzonden: woensdag 26 juli 2006 2:33
Aan: Open Source Flash Mailing List
Onderwerp: Re: [osflash] [ANN] Aptana IDE for AFLAX...

 

 

I'll add these to our bug tracking system at http://www.aptana.com/trac

 

Short answers are:

 

1.ab: yes, we'll be adding more doc-types and validation support in the

future

 

2. the Aptana IDE is focused on the new 'Web 2.0 movement' or AJAX, which is

about enabling rich clients through the use of advanced JavaScript, CSS, and

HTML. AFLAX just brings Flash into the AJAX fold more easily.

 

Thanks and we welcome as much feedback as possible.

 

-Paul

 

 

> Paul,

> i've looked over and over for a nice html + css editor, since i'm

> already done with dreamweaver. but since today i found naerly all of

> them to fuzzy, old and or too web 0.9 alike. and since you offer a nice

> linux support: this is the dot on top of the i, as we say.

> 

> since i alreadydl'ed it, and started the demo-project here are my 2

> first questions:

> 

> #1.a: can you tell us, if there will be more supported doc-types in the

> near future (xhtml-strict would be fine) ?

> #1.b: will there be a validator option, or is this already implemented ?

> #2: while watching the first video, i found the code-complete-flyouts a

> little bit overdone, is there any chance to reduce this to let's say

> only html, css and js ? i mean this would be fine when we could switch

> in some way.

> don't get me wrong: i don't like the way you're using js to render swf.

> point is: user has to have js active, which is in my opinion in most

> cases unuseful or not even used. anyway, i respect the efforts that have

> been made, and find this editor a nice alternative to common ones.

> 

> i think i will give it some more time, and maybe i come with some more

> questions or requests, if wanted.

> 

> cheers

> micha

> 

> 

> _______________________________________________

> osflash mailing list

> osflash at osflash.org

> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

 

 

_______________________________________________

osflash mailing list

osflash at osflash.org

http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/osflash_osflash.org/attachments/20060727/30496c8a/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 43836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://osflash.org/pipermail/osflash_osflash.org/attachments/20060727/30496c8a/attachment-0001.jpg