[osflash] [ANN] Aptana IDE for AFLAX...

[Paul Colton]

We¹ll look into this right away. You may also want to submit a bug report to
www.aptana.com/trac

Thanks,
Paul


On 7/27/06 4:26 AM, "Arnoud Bos" <a.bos9 at chello.nl> wrote:

>  
> Hi Paul, 
>  
> I played a bit with aptana and i must say: Really impressive!!
> So, I'm changing from Homesite to Aptana for (D)HTML, AJAX development right
> away.
>  
> One small remark is that the welcome screen doesn't load the
> stylesheet/images.
>  
> See:
>  
> 
>  
>  
> Thanx for sharing such a nice tool!
>  
> Arnoud
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: osflash-bounces at osflash.org [mailto:osflash-bounces at osflash.org] Namens
> Paul Colton
> Verzonden: woensdag 26 juli 2006 2:33
> Aan: Open Source Flash Mailing List
> Onderwerp: Re: [osflash] [ANN] Aptana IDE for AFLAX...
>  
>  
> I'll add these to our bug tracking system at http://www.aptana.com/trac
>  
> Short answers are:
>  
> 1.ab: yes, we'll be adding more doc-types and validation support in the
> future
>  
> 2. the Aptana IDE is focused on the new 'Web 2.0 movement' or AJAX, which is
> about enabling rich clients through the use of advanced JavaScript, CSS, and
> HTML. AFLAX just brings Flash into the AJAX fold more easily.
>  
> Thanks and we welcome as much feedback as possible.
>  
> -Paul
>  
>  
>> > Paul,
>> > i've looked over and over for a nice html + css editor, since i'm
>> > already done with dreamweaver. but since today i found naerly all of
>> > them to fuzzy, old and or too web 0.9 alike. and since you offer a nice
>> > linux support: this is the dot on top of the i, as we say.
>> > 
>> > since i alreadydl'ed it, and started the demo-project here are my 2
>> > first questions:
>> > 
>> > #1.a: can you tell us, if there will be more supported doc-types in the
>> > near future (xhtml-strict would be fine) ?
>> > #1.b: will there be a validator option, or is this already implemented ?
>> > #2: while watching the first video, i found the code-complete-flyouts a
>> > little bit overdone, is there any chance to reduce this to let's say
>> > only html, css and js ? i mean this would be fine when we could switch
>> > in some way.
>> > don't get me wrong: i don't like the way you're using js to render swf.
>> > point is: user has to have js active, which is in my opinion in most
>> > cases unuseful or not even used. anyway, i respect the efforts that have
>> > been made, and find this editor a nice alternative to common ones.
>> > 
>> > i think i will give it some more time, and maybe i come with some more
>> > questions or requests, if wanted.
>> > 
>> > cheers
>> > micha
>> > 
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > osflash mailing list
>> > osflash at osflash.org
>> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/osflash_osflash.org/attachments/20060727/3caea0ee/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 43836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://osflash.org/pipermail/osflash_osflash.org/attachments/20060727/3caea0ee/attachment-0001.jpg