[osflash] [announcement] CakeAMFPHP 0.6.0 released

[Martin Wood-Mitrovski]

Marcelo de Moraes Serpa wrote:
>> This is one of the reasons I avoid returning recordsets from CakeAMFPHP,
> the
>> other is because the DBConnection stuff makes the code specific to the
> remoting
>> interface. Just returning the cake array structures allows you to keep 
>> the
> same
>> code for both html and remoting sections.
> 
> Thanks for clarifying this, Martin. I also had this fog about which
> technique to use. The recordset way would also make it harder to implement
> your typemapper, I think.
> 
> I guess gwoo used the recordset technique on the cakeamfbb sample?

yeah, he did.

I still use recordsets occasionally, for long lists of stuff thats only going to 
be shown in flash and will need the paging support.

I think at the moment its just a matter of taking each situation on its own 
merits..if you can or need to use recordsets then theyre there.

> Sorry if I'm missing something, but what does Arrayf stands for?

apparently the f stands for filtered. Its a part of the standard AMFPHP 
distribution.

The comment says :

The arrayf adapter is a filtered mySQL adapter riggged
to only transmit certain column names. Must be typed manually.

thats about as much as i know about it :)


martin