[osflash] Disseminating OSFlash (was IDE mon amour, the poll results.)

[João Saleiro]

Well, people here are geek, and we have geek talks. And we prefer being 
geek and talking geek. Personally i would prefer to have two different 
systems: and "introductory" site, *presenting* what's osflash and how to 
use it, and the current system for developers.
It's not discrimination: when i was starting with osflash, i had a lot 
of doubts (concerning the language itself, despite knowing quite a lot 
about actionscript already) that i didn't formulated on the mailing 
list, because they weren't "geeky" enough. And some of the ones i've 
asked were never answered. And today, i prefer reading and talking about 
"how to apply this design pattern" or "what do you think about this 
framework" than "how can i load a MovieClip?".

In resume, I would prefer one "Welcome to Osflash, learn about osflash" 
web-site and another "now that you know the basics of osflash, let's 
start doing big things like we, geeky developers, do" website. It's a 
matter of opinion, and this is mine...

João Saleiro

PS: Geek in a good meaning, of course :P



Ian Thomas wrote:
>>> Or improving the current wiki.
>>>       
>
> I think this sounds much more viable than creating a whole newbie site
> from scratch. If the information isn't there - then add it to the
> Wiki. That's why it's a Wiki, after all!
>
> Ian
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>