[osflash] XMLSchema -> ActionScript
Antonio De Donatis
osflash at xleff.org
Mon Sep 25 06:57:48 EDT 2006
I do not know you and, because of that, I would feel double sorry if you
unsubscribe after this conversation.
We were just chatting and I am the sole responsible of the basic
misunderstanding happened here.
Osflash is, quite simply, as good as it gets when it comes to open source
Flash and you would definitely miss it, if you are interested in the Flash
technology platform as I am.
Via e-mail tones can easily appear harsh or be misinterpreted - that's why
is so important to have and give a chance to rectify.
Reconsider your choice.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Rogers [mailto:kRogers at iwin.com]
> Sent: 25 September 2006 01:13
> To: antonio at xleff.org; Open Source Flash Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [osflash] XMLSchema -> ActionScript
> Regardless, you were only trying to help and didn't deserve the type of
> responses from folks around here. I personally find this list polluted
> with people responding in a " I'm right your wrong" fashion and find it
> very tiring. There are plenty of ways to explain how your opinion to
> others without being snobbish , standofish or downright arrogant.
> I am done with reading the constant slew of negative, sefl rightous
> responses to folks obviously just trying to lend a hand.
> Kudos to you for taking time out of your day for trying to help folks
> Antonio. And to you arrogant people, cya
> Antonio De Donatis wrote:
> > My mistake, sorry.
> > I recently changed the Outlook view related to the OSFlash
> mailing list to
> > be able to go through it faster and that made the subject almost
> > invisible... =)
> > I wish to have been more helpful by suggesting XLEFF but it
> definitely has
> > nothing to do with XML Schema.
> > -----Original Message-----
> >> From: David Holroyd [mailto:osflash at badgers-in-foil.co.uk]
> >> Sent: 23 September 2006 15:17
> >> To: osflash at osflash.org
> >> Subject: Re: [osflash] XMLSchema -> ActionScript
> >> On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 03:18:01AM +0100, Antonio De Donatis wrote:
> >>> Please note that I replied to the very first message, trying to help.
> >>> There was no mention of XML Schema there, although Howard
> >> mentioned the term
> >>> "schema" (lowercase).
> >> Sorry about the confusion, my first message should have been a bit
> >> clearer.
> >> Note the subject of the email though :)
> >> ta,
> >> dave
> >> --
> >> http://david.holroyd.me.uk/
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> osflash mailing list
> >> osflash at osflash.org
> >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > osflash mailing list
> > osflash at osflash.org
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
More information about the osflash