[osflash] SWF9 and FLV File Format Spec released
Martin Wood-Mitrovski
flashdev at relivethefuture.com
Tue Aug 7 14:00:03 PDT 2007
> which I answered being a joke argument,
> because sorry most of the flash I experienced running
> on PSP and mobile device are games, and as the same
> as games for bigger device (XBOX, WII, etc.) those flash games
> are not designed at all for impaired people,
> this is simply not the audience target;
> which imho is a valid argument.
but its not a joke. its one aspect of the current state of affairs which *could*
be remedied by not having such a restrictive licence on the spec.
its a very important aspect and something that is all too easily forgotten, but
its not the only point. Just because your experience only extends so far doesnt
mean that the world ends there, unfortunately its a result of that kind of
mindset which is limiting what is available for people who require accessibility.
I think this point really just highlights that the reasoning behind the spec
licence is actually in direct contradiction with reality. The player landscape
is *less* consistent because people cant use the spec to fill in the gaps.
> and I realized that i was just losing my time trying to argument with
> an "universalist"
> which obviously has an agenda against Adobe and Flash and enjoy a
> little too much
> contrcuting a big controversy abotu a sensitive topic such as accessibility
> (cf a troll defintion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll ).
I know what a troll is, and I still maintain that he's not trolling. He isnt
creating a controversy, the situation exists and it could be better. I
personally feel somewhat ashamed of my own lack of implementation of any kind of
accessibility in every app i've built, especially considering that most of my
work is for educational usage in schools.
> I would rather spend time argumenting about why/what could change in that spec
> to make open source people more happy without just ranting at Adobe
> for the sake of it.
Well, its not about changing the spec, its about the licencing of the spec. The
content of the actual spec is irrelevant because I cant read it without
fundamentally undermining my opportunities, whether they be in open source or in
closed source software.
The current situation with gnash and other tools is one important part which is
directly affected, but I also have to consider its impact on my own work. Its
not too far fetched to imagine that I could be offered some potential work in
the future that requires some kind of swf reading / playing (in fact its quite
likely for me) so to protect my availability for such work I have to avoid
reading the spec.
martin.
More information about the osflash
mailing list