[osflash] Why Flash?

[Marcelo de Moraes Serpa]

>
> We are adding SWF support today and should have this build live sometime
> next week.
>

I wonder what do you mean by "SWF support"?

On 1/12/07, Merrill, Jason <jason.merrill at bankofamerica.com> wrote:
>
>  Very nice. Great job.
>
>
> Jason Merrill
> Bank of America
> Learning & Organizational Effectiveness
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* osflash-bounces at osflash.org [mailto:osflash-bounces at osflash.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Steve Polk
> *Sent:* Friday, January 12, 2007 1:29 PM
> *To:* 'Open Source Flash Mailing List'
> *Subject:* Re: [osflash] Why Flash?
>
>  Yes, the entire site was built in Flash 8 with a custom .Net remoting AMF
> gateway someone here wrote. I started with a strict OOP setup, but as the
> timeline changed and the entire scope changed I ended up with some
> unorganized code. I am hoping to re-factor the code soon. We are adding SWF
> support today and should have this build live sometime next week.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* osflash-bounces at osflash.org [mailto:osflash-bounces at osflash.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
> *Sent:* Friday, January 12, 2007 12:07 PM
> *To:* Open Source Flash Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [osflash] Why Flash?
>
>
>
> Impressive Steve. What version of Flash? 8?
>
> On 1/4/07, *Steve Polk* <nospam at webpolk.com> wrote:
>
> We just finished version 1 of a 100% Flash-based social-networking site.
> The
> site was built for a brand (dr. pepper), with teenagers in mind, so things
> like chat have been left out on purpose (legal) for now.
>
> http://www.liquidstate.com
>
> I am hoping we will go through another round or two of development, as
> this
> version was rushed and we had some great ideas to allow users to customize
>
> the content more. I still have lots of refactoring that needs to happen
> still too.
>
> Whether it will be successful is a good question. They are going to seed
> content soon through a university contest, then they will launch it to the
>
> world via ad campaigns and printing on the bottles.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: osflash-bounces at osflash.org [mailto: osflash-bounces at osflash.org] On
> Behalf Of phil dupre
> Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2006 12:15 PM
> To: osflash at osflash.org
> Subject: [osflash] Why Flash?
>
>
> The other day, I was talking about social networking
> sites with a friend, I defended Flash as the right
> solution claiming it has far more visual capabilities
> than a site operating on CSS or HTML,  His question in
> response to my Flash bias left me stumped for an
> answer.
>
> He said, "Most successful sites are done with a mix of
> Flash and HTML such as YouTube, MySpace, etc.  What
> successful networking sites have been produced all in
> Flash, if any?"
>
> I couldn't answer my friend's question, but from a
> historical standpoint, this is a valid question and
> would be interesting to discuss.  Any answers out
> there?
>
> Thanks.
>
> PD
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/osflash_osflash.org/attachments/20070112/cd4f3639/attachment-0001.htm