[osflash] OS Source Code Licenses

[Paul Neave]

This is big misconception with the creative commons license. CC is not
intended to be used for software. You should use the GPL or MIT
license instead: http://creativecommons.org/license/cc-gpl

Best,
Paul.

2008/7/2 Niels Wolf <niels.wolf at mediacatalyst.com>:
> additional:
>
> http://creativecommons.org/license/
>
> For those who know what they want and a form that gives them the right
> license in return... Generative speaking
>
>
> On 7/2/08 1:01 PM, "Giles Taylor" <Giles.Taylor at Transart.co.uk> wrote:
>
> The thanks should go to Grant! ;)
> Some proper authoritative information on this subject would be really useful
> to have on the OS Flash site. Any Lawyers/Part-time OS Flash Devs out
> there???
>
>
> From: osflash-bounces at osflash.org [mailto:osflash-bounces at osflash.org] On
> Behalf Of Kamaleshwar Morjal
> Sent: 02 July 2008 16:11
> To: Open Source Flash Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [osflash] OS Source Code Licenses
>
> Very useful information. Many thanks.
>
> Giles Taylor wrote:
> Hi All,
> Grant Skinner has posted an overview of the more common OS Licenses on his
> blog, examining how they relate to flash:
> http://www.gskinner.com/blog/archives/2008/07/source_code_lic_1.html
>
> Interesting read!
> Giles
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> osflash at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
>