[Red5] Video Object
daccattato at gmail.com
Fri Dec 9 08:54:10 EST 2005
we have tested almost every type of flv file:
all flvs played fine. In fact, all we have to do is read the correct chunks
of data and pass them down the correct channel. I don't understand why
other servers would not play the vp6 as well. However, thats not in our
scope of discussion. We should just be happy that there are no problemss on
our end. :)
On 12/9/05, hank williams <hank777 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/9/05, Stefan Richter <stefan at flashcomguru.com> wrote:
> > Have you seen Darron Schall's Flash VNC client?
> > BTW I agree that using the built in codec seems sensible. I would
> > that VP6 support will come at some stage.
> I think red5 will support vp6 from the start, just the way FMS does no?
> > Stefan
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Red5-bounces at osflash.org
> > > [mailto:Red5-bounces at osflash.org] On Behalf Of Rob Terrell
> > > Sent: 09 December 2005 01:56
> > > To: Red5 at osflash.org
> > > Subject: Re: [Red5] Video Object
> > >
> > > That's true -- you can use a binary socket for transport,
> > > read the stream data, decompress and write to a bitmap via
> > > setpixel -- but do you really want to? Seems like sticking
> > > with the native codec(s) built in to the Flash player will be
> > > fastest and give the best results. So -- I still think Red5
> > > is relevant and important.
> > >
> > > I think the binary socket in 8.5 will enable some nifty new
> > > things (i.e. I've started thinking about an all-Flash VNC
> > > viewer) but, as far as video goes, rtmp is probably still the
> > > way to go.
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Red5 mailing list
> > Red5 at osflash.org
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
> Red5 mailing list
> Red5 at osflash.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Red5