[Red5] Video Object

[Chris Allen]

Hi Dan,

We, or I should say, Luke has abstracted the protocol layer very well, and
adding new protocols for the server to use will be straight forward.  If
fact it has always been a priority to make sure that we are not always tied
to RTMP if we choose not to be.

-Chris

On 12/9/05, Dan Kantor <dan.kantor at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  That would be very interesting if Red5 can handle different streaming
> protocols. As great as RTMP is, it is still proprietary to flash. I would
> also love to see how a binary socket class compares to native RTMP.
>
>
>
> On Streampad, I use the sound object to get a URL. The performance is very
> good, but I hate the fact that the mp3 is cached.
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Red5-bounces at osflash.org [mailto:Red5-bounces at osflash.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Dominick Accattato
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 08, 2005 7:37 PM
> *To:* Red5 at osflash.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Red5] Video Object
>
>
>
> Dan, yes you are right on and I feel that we are writing R5 with that in
> mind.  In fact, We could have the new binary socket connect to another port
> of R5 and speak with rtmp applications transparently.  So, nice observation
> and look forward to that implementation sometime in the distant future ;)
>
> On 12/8/05, *Dan Kantor* <dan.kantor at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What are everyone's feelings on 8.5? I have read that you can create
> binary sockets. Does this make the FCS less important as we can now write a
> class that streams a more standard format like rtsp?
>
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Red5-bounces at osflash.org [mailto: Red5-bounces at osflash.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Dominick Accattato
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 08, 2005 6:41 PM
> *To:* Red5 at osflash.org
> *Subject:* [Red5] Video Object
>
>
>
> Fellow R5 devs:
>
> Previous to the Flash Player 8.5, users were forced to drag a video object
> onto the screen to be able to use within actionscript.  Now I'm not  100%
> sure about this, but I believe that the 8.5 player has changed that.  This
> is because the latest technology allows for an application to be created
> without a timeline and directly through code.  This information should be
> helpful for those working on the clientside of R5.  Scott H. has already
> done a quick rendition of an actionstep video component that can connect to
> a rtmp compliant server such as R5.  When time comes to utilize the 8.5player, new components can come out that do not need to load external swfs
> just for their video objects.  K, take this information as it is and play!
>
> Dominick Accattato, CTO
> New View Networks
> www.newviewnetworks.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> Red5 at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> Red5 at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/red5_osflash.org/attachments/20051209/f6f92f04/attachment-0001.htm