[Red5] C# & Red5

[Bernhard]

My (now very old) version is available for download here:
http://3dchat.game-host.org/~schwimmlehrer/webcam.zip
I stopped developing it because of performance problems and because I did 
not manage to implement something like bandwidth control (i.e. dropping 
packets and stuff). So in an instant the picture the user sees lags behind 
the live picture (BTW: Is this working by now?).

About using Spring in C#: I would really like to see a design that separates 
"Application Server" and "Protocol Libraries". It should be possible and 
permitted to implement or use a subset of Red5. IMHO this would make it a 
lot easier to understand, implement, test and integrate Red5, especially 
when re-implementing it in other languages. ASP.Net has a lot of very 
powerful configuration options.

For my use I just need a live webcam. I don't need application server 
functionality. I am using Mono on Linux, which is open source. So Mono 
support is important. About Java vs. C#: .Net was built with hosting in 
mind, Java was not. In general .Net uses less resources.

Thank you
Bernhard

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chris Allen" <mrchrisallen at gmail.com>
To: <Red5 at osflash.org>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 11:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Red5] C# & Red5


> Yeah, I think those guys still are interested in creating a port of
> Red5 to that platform.  I know that the Java version however, isn't at
> a stable point to to do this yet.  Probably by version 0.6 these guys
> will begin working on the .Net version.  I'm not them though, so we
> can wait and see what they say.
>
> -Chris
>
> On 3/3/06, services at rationalpath.com <services at rationalpath.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks, I only asked because some of the members (Bernhard/Bryan) were
>> discussing getting Red5 working in C#.
>>
>>
>>
>>  ________________________________
>>
>>
>> From: Red5-bounces at osflash.org [mailto:Red5-bounces at osflash.org] On 
>> Behalf
>> Of Connor Penhale
>>  Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 4:54 PM
>>  To: Red5 at osflash.org
>>  Subject: Re: [Red5] C# & Red5
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> C# is not that portable of a language, to be put lightly... I belive 
>> that's
>> why Java was chosen as the language for the development of Red5, because 
>> of
>> its universality and portability. If you need to use ASP.NET, try doing 
>> some
>> of your client/server interaction as a shared object within Red5 which
>> consumes a SOAP webobject. I don't see Red5 being ported to C# (this is 
>> my
>> personal perspective as a user of Red5, not a developer). You can run 
>> Red5
>> as a windows service, simply write a C# wrapper for the Java code.
>>
>>  Best of Luck :)
>>  Connor
>>
>>
>> On 3/3/06, services at rationalpath.com < services at rationalpath.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Would anyone be able to point be to the C# port of Red5 (in whatever 
>> state
>> its in?). I need to come up with a quick solution to build a 
>> bi-directional
>> channel between Flex 2.0 and C# code either running in ASP.NET or even
>> better just a windows service. Also, am I wrong in thinking this protocol
>> might be used in place of AMF3 for binary communications between Flash 
>> AS3
>> and C#?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Red5 mailing list
>>  Red5 at osflash.org
>>  http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Red5 mailing list
>> Red5 at osflash.org
>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> Red5 at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org