[Red5] documentation

[John Grden]

yeah I'd agree that we have to take care of remaining issues like what you
described. We're thinking that an RC2 will most likely happen to make sure
we have a VERY strong v0.6 final

Thanks Dan, appreciate your help very much,

john

On 11/9/06, Dan Rossi <spam at electroteque.org> wrote:
>
> John Grden wrote:
> >
> >
> > agreed, if you get into other features beyond something basic, then
> > you get into the api, but I see a clean/clear line between those 2
> > topics.  would you agree?
>
> We'd have to see whos requirements are more than just out of the box
> then, but yes a skeleton adaptor does what you said, but dont you have
> to setup the SO first and perisistance objects were breaking the server
> from starting up again only recently.
>
> Im going to put what I know are issues into another thread then, coz
> they have yet to be resolved and i guess they should before the release
> of 0.6.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> Red5 at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>



-- 
[  JPG  ]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/red5_osflash.org/attachments/20061109/b49b88c1/attachment.htm