neoriley at gmail.com
Thu Nov 9 22:26:34 EST 2006
yeah I'd agree that we have to take care of remaining issues like what you
described. We're thinking that an RC2 will most likely happen to make sure
we have a VERY strong v0.6 final
Thanks Dan, appreciate your help very much,
On 11/9/06, Dan Rossi <spam at electroteque.org> wrote:
> John Grden wrote:
> > agreed, if you get into other features beyond something basic, then
> > you get into the api, but I see a clean/clear line between those 2
> > topics. would you agree?
> We'd have to see whos requirements are more than just out of the box
> then, but yes a skeleton adaptor does what you said, but dont you have
> to setup the SO first and perisistance objects were breaking the server
> from starting up again only recently.
> Im going to put what I know are issues into another thread then, coz
> they have yet to be resolved and i guess they should before the release
> of 0.6.
> Red5 mailing list
> Red5 at osflash.org
[ JPG ]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Red5