[Red5] Serving both static content and RTMPT off of red5 standalone server?

[Ignacio Lopez]

For what I've been reading it seems that the propper solution would be to
host the red5 inside Tomcat and then have two different IPs, one for the
HTTP in port 80 and the other for the RTMPT in port 80 (you can set up the
DNSs in every way you like).

Hope that helps

On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Curt Bererton <curt.bererton at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I've been trying to find the easiest way to serve both static content
> and RTMPT using the red5 standalone server. Hopefully, someone out
> there can check the following plan out and tell me if it's reasonable.
>
> I was wondering if it was possible to set up red5 so that
> http://www.mydomain.com/ would serve static content using port 80 and
> then (on the same server) have http://apps.mydomain.com handle
> connections from flash clients on port 80 (RTMPT), 443 (RTMPS), and
> 1935 (RTMP).   Being more familiar with Apache, I could see how one
> might do this with apache, but I'm not as familiar with jetty and
> red5's configuration in specific. Ideally it wouldn't be necessary to
> run both apache and red5 on the same machine, and I could just set up
> red5/jetty to do the virtual hosting above.
>
> Right now it looks like red5 uses different ports for the http
> server(5080), https server(8443)  and  rtmp protocols being on 1935,
> and 8088(rtmpt) respectively.
>
> Does anyone know how I might go about setting up a virtual host scheme
> above with the red5 config so that the virtual host does the work of
> forwarding the packets to the right place? Or is this a bad idea for
> some reason?
>
> ~Curt
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> Red5 at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/red5_osflash.org/attachments/20080406/9fb1666a/attachment.html