[Red5] latest trunk

[Daniel Rossi]

On 28/07/2008, at 9:39 PM, Sales Department wrote:
>
>
> b) When we had more than 50 or 60 live viewers (20Mbits + of total
> traffic), it would take up to 45 seconds to a minute for the viewer
> client to receive a connection and update from the shared object  
> (Flash
> SO, that is).
>

45 seconds to connect ! What was the load on the origin ? Were you  
connecting the edges to the origin over a local gigabit lan or on the  
public ethernet which is needed for the edge connections !

I did a performance trial run and wasn't happy with it just yet it  
might need some revisiting. The cpu load on the edges with dual dual  
core xeons ramped up 10%, the cpu performance of the origin also  
ramped up aswell which makes me believe this solution isnt scalable ,  
isnt the whole point is that the edges take most the load ? It got  
between 10-30% overall but from 5-10%  thats a bit of a worry.

>
> Any ideas from anyone on this?
>
>
> Daniel Rossi wrote:
>> HandshakeServer or something like that, look for a property called
>> index, it's obtaining negative int indexes on the arrays so gets
>> outofrange exceptions and forces a break in the connnection.
>>
>>
>> On 28/07/2008, at 8:40 AM, matthodgson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'd love to troubleshoot this if someone can point me to the
>>> relevant files
>>> and methods. I've got a number of macs and from what I've seen this
>>> is the
>>> last piece needed for having a relatively production safe version of
>>> trunk...
>>>
>>> Steven, Paul, any pointers you can give me on what the problem is
>>> and how
>>> one might troubleshoot it would be helpful.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>
>>> Daniel Rossi-2 wrote:
>>>
>>>> the handshake system is still broken for osx clients and its  
>>>> random.
>>>> i'll reattempt connection with my flex client a dozen times and
>>>> connects again.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 27/07/2008, at 7:49 AM, Sales Department wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone know of any major problems with the current trunk?  I'm
>>>>> thinking
>>>>> of updating a few servers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Bill
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Red5 mailing list
>>>>> Red5 at osflash.org
>>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Red5 mailing list
>>>> Red5 at osflash.org
>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/latest-trunk-tp18671252p18681443.html
>>> Sent from the Red5 - English mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Red5 mailing list
>>> Red5 at osflash.org
>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Red5 mailing list
>> Red5 at osflash.org
>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5 mailing list
> Red5 at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org