[Red5] Res: New Install, SVN or Release 7.0?

[Tony Su]

OK,

Maybe a little clarification might be in order…

 

When working directly from source, I’m used to pointing a subversion client to a subversion server, then pulling down whatever iteration/version I want.

 

Unless I’m really misunderstanding something, you’re referencing a location where only a zipped snapshot exists. Everything else in the “repository” directory seems to be a hodgepodge of misc resource files but no actual Red5 distribution.

 

If that’s what it is, then so be it but I just want to make sure I’m looking at the right thing.

And, maybe the 0.7.0 branch in the main repository  (http://svn1.cvsdude.com/osflash/red5/java/server/) really includes all changes?

 

Thx,

Tony

 

From: red5-bounces at osflash.org [mailto:red5-bounces at osflash.org] On Behalf Of Victor Brunetti
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 2:23 PM
To: red5 at osflash.org
Subject: [Red5] Res: New Install, SVN or Release 7.0?

 

red5-dev
http://red5.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/snapshots/

 

 

 

 

Victor Brunetti
www.GaleriaBrasil.net <http://www.galeriabrasil.net/> 

 

----- Mensagem original ----
De: Tony Su <TonySu at su-networking.com>
Para: red5 at osflash.org
Enviadas: Terça-feira, 17 de Junho de 2008 17:34:19
Assunto: Re: [Red5] New Install, SVN or Release 7.0?

Is there a special location for 0.7.1-dev?

I’m browsing the main repository and only see 0.7.0.

 

Thx,

Tony

 

From: red5-bounces at osflash.org [mailto:red5-bounces at osflash.org] On Behalf Of Mondain
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:31 AM
To: red5 at osflash.org
Subject: Re: [Red5] New Install, SVN or Release 7.0?

 

SVN (0.7.1-dev) is superior and only gets better by the day, but being a dev version means that it may be "unstable". If you dont mind being on the cutting-edge then use SVN.

Paul

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:42 AM, Tony Su <TonySu at su-networking.com> wrote:

Howdy,
Just started taking a look at Red5,

Although I started to try to install the Release tarball into SuSE, I
quickly found that there is hardly any reliable documentation for
installing the regular releases, particularly if some of the
prerequisites are installed from official distro sources.

Skimming the different install documentation for different distros, I
was struck by how similar and yet so different they all were, numerous
times I found better descriptions of steps in one vs another. My guess
is that it would be worthwhile for someone to consolidate and clean up
the many instructions to maybe two (SVN and official release).

Then, I started considering that the current official Release (7.0) was
released nearly 4 months ago... and further skimming the SVN changelog
there might be at least 3 significant and several more lesser
improvements since 7.0...

Is the general consensus that SVN is more or less stable enough to
install at this time and vastly preferable over the Release 7.0?

TIA for opinions...

Tony

_______________________________________________
Red5 mailing list
Red5 at osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5_osflash.org




-- 
It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere. - Voltaire 

 

________________________________

Abra sua conta no Yahoo! Mail <http://br.rd.yahoo.com/mail/taglines/mail/*http:/br.mail.yahoo.com/> , o único sem limite de espaço para armazenamento! 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/red5_osflash.org/attachments/20080617/69c3daed/attachment.html