[Red5devs] Red5 0.7 Sprint

[Luke Hubbard]

I will try to test with a profiler see what is eating all that CPU.
This is for VOD right, not live? Or both?

- Luke

On 1/21/08, Dan Rossi <spam at electroteque.org> wrote:
>
> Less than that before its reaching 100% cpu. aparantly i go away on a
> break and everything goes down. It might be looking like we might have to
> jump onto the wowza bandwagon :\
> On 20/01/2008, at 9:55 AM, Dominick Accattato wrote:
>
> Dan:
>
> are you saying that the core can only handle 50-80 concurrent connections?
>
> On Jan 19, 2008, at 6:28 AM, Dan Rossi wrote:
>
> Great, i added the preliminary task in there but didnt get much responses
> about it at first :D Should we add back in the option to either compile
> javadoc in a full distribution task or not, that was added in as a
> suggestion from steve but was removed. It does reduce the recompile time
> alot.
> I believe the major one that i know of is the performance problems
> somewhere in the core, its maxing out at 50-80 concurrents.
>
> On 19/01/2008, at 3:15 AM, Mondain wrote:
>
> If we plan to inform users of the edge/origin features, we will also need
> to get those parts of the build script ironed-out before the release as
> well.
>
> Paul
>
> On Jan 18, 2008 4:52 AM, Lenny Sorey < lrsorey at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hey Joachim,
> >
> > Welcome back!!
> >
> > Glad to see your return.
> >
> > Hope things are well with these days.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Lenny
> >
> >
> > On 1/17/08, Dominick Accattato <daccattato at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Team:
> > >
> > > I want to give Joachim a warm welcome back.  We missed ya!  Everyone
> > > has done a great job pushing Red5 forward from the 0.6 release.  In
> > > preparation of the release of 0.7, I'd like to get a few more fixes
> > > in.  If we can, lets try to get this stuff done asap so that we can get
> > > 0.7 out the door.  Here is what I find to be of importance for this
> > > release.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >    - http://jira.red5.org/browse/APPSERVER-184
> > >    - amf3 synchronization issue with SharedObjects (I will provide
> > >    Joachim with a test app)
> > >    - fix our tests since Paul noticed many of them are failing
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If anyone can think of any other important fixes, list them so that we
> > > can look into their priority.  Thanks team!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Red5devs mailing list
> > > Red5devs at osflash.org
> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5devs_osflash.org
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Red5devs mailing list
> > Red5devs at osflash.org
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5devs_osflash.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere. - Voltaire
> _______________________________________________
> Red5devs mailing list
> Red5devs at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5devs_osflash.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5devs mailing list
> Red5devs at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5devs_osflash.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5devs mailing list
> Red5devs at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5devs_osflash.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5devs mailing list
> Red5devs at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5devs_osflash.org
>
>


-- 
Luke Hubbard
codegent | coding for the people
http://www.codegent.com

NMA Top 100 Interactive Agencies - Ones to watch!
http://www.codegent.com/top100/

want to know more?
http://www.codegent.com/showreel/

This e-mail may contain information which is privileged, confidential and
protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this
e-mail, or any part of it, please delete this email and any attachments
immediately on receipt. You should not disclose the contents to any other
person or take copies. Any views expressed in this message are those of the
individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of codegent limited.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/red5devs_osflash.org/attachments/20080121/13d0ccd3/attachment.html