[Red5devs] H323 / SIP support planed ?

[Pau Minoves]

Well, in my opinion the topic of the thread is a bit misplaced.

While my intention is to develop a SIP gateway this is not the feature
i want to add to Red5. To have SIP, I need RTP. You are right, SIP
functionality is better placed as a webapp (also because his logic is
webapp dependant). It makes no sense to just bundle the JainSIP jar to
Red5. If somebody needs SIP, then they can add it to his webapp
./lib/.

The problem I see is that to add RTP capabilities to Red5 i cannot
just add JRTP jar to my webapp, i need to modify Red5. Of course I can
modify my own copy of Red5 and deliver my solution with a patched
Red5. But i think adding RTP (no SIP, no RTSP, plain RTP) to Red5 is a
nice feature. Red5 would then be able to interact with standard media
infrastructure.

IMHO we can just stop talking about SIP and start talking about RTP :)

Regards,
Pau

On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Daniel Rossi <spam at electroteque.org> wrote:
> These kind of things sound really far out. But personally is swaying
>  against red5's original features. From experience feature rich tends
>  to be bloaty. I reckon these things should be split up into sections,
>  or plugins so people can pick and choose.
>
>  Or maybe these things can be contained inside a custom webapp if it
>  doesnt require changing the source ? Lease resistance that doesnt end
>  up affecting everything down the line.
>
>  What are the changes exactly for ?
>
>
>
>  On 29/03/2008, at 11:28 PM, Pau Minoves wrote:
>
>  > HI,
>  >
>  > Hi feel i have to ping this topic :)
>  >
>  > I'm gona start working on this patch in a week or two (i'm waiting for
>  > an upper "ok, go on"). In the meanwhile if there is more people
>  > interested on this we can start discusion on the howto.
>  >
>  > About the transcoding, would the Red5 developers accept a dependency
>  > to an external binary program (ffmpeg)?
>  >
>  > About the RTP, as AFAIK there is no RTP MINA implementation (which
>  > would be very nice) it is ok to add another library (JRTP[1])?
>  >
>  > [1] https://jrtp.dev.java.net/
>  >
>  > thanks!
>  > Pau
>  >
>  > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Pau Minoves
>  > <pau.minoves at towodo.net> wrote:
>  >> Wops! I forgo to reply Michael.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>> I am also interested in this solution and may have some cycles to
>  >>> work
>  >>> on this.
>  >>
>  >> Great!
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>> Would the plan be to convert RTMP packets on one side of RED5
>  >>> to SIP (for signalling) and RTP (for media)?
>  >>
>  >> Exactly :)
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>> Do you have an architecture diagram?
>  >>
>  >> No i don't. I lack red5 knowledge to draw an internal diagram of
>  >> the patch.
>  >>
>  >>
>  >>> I am also new to Red5 so could would also need
>  >>> help with understanding the RTMP format and media formats.
>  >>
>  >> I hope core developers are willing to help here :)
>  >>
>  >> Regards,
>  >> Pau
>  >>
>  >
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
>  > Red5devs mailing list
>  > Red5devs at osflash.org
>  > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5devs_osflash.org
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Red5devs mailing list
>  Red5devs at osflash.org
>  http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5devs_osflash.org
>