[Red5devs] Request for review

[Thijs Triemstra | Collab]

Hi Art,

just ping me on Skype for point 3.

And guys, please give Art a response about the other items, he's  
working his ass off to get our server in even better shape.

Cheers,

Thijs

On 16 okt 2008, at 17:03, Art Clarke wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I'm still awaiting feedback before I release to the outside world.
> I've heard from Luke (+1), but here are the key questions again:
> 1) Does built.theyard.net do what folks want?
> 2) Can someone (maybe Paul?) work with me to review the changes in the
> aclarke_autotest branch before I commit (or just tell me to go ahead)?
> 3) Can someone (maybe Thijs) work with me to review the
> svn/flash/trunk/selftest application for appropriateness?
> 4) Can someone volunteer to provide a permanent host to replace
> http://build.theyard.net/?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - Art
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Art Clarke <aclarke at vlideshow.com>  
> wrote:
>> And here's an example of what a successful system-test looks like
>> (i.e. the artifacts you can review):
>> http://build.theyard.net/job/red5_java_server_trunk_jdk6_i386_ubuntu_systemtest/1/
>>
>> - Art
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Art Clarke <aclarke at vlideshow.com>  
>> wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> I have finished the first draft of the test framework I proposed two
>>> weeks ago.  Major thanks to Thijs who helped set up the initial  
>>> server
>>> and showed me how to get Tomcat, Apache and Hudson playing nice.
>>>
>>> The bulk of my changes are checked in under the
>>> svn/java/server/branches/aclarke_autotest branch(*),
>>>
>>> You can find full documentation of what I did here:
>>> http://ofb.net/~aclarke/theyard/HOWTO-TestRed5.html
>>>
>>> What I'd love for folks to do is:
>>> 1) Go to build.theyard.net and see what you get.
>>>
>>>   Right now 1 Unit test fails on Java 1.6, and more fail on Java
>>> 1.5.  I'd like to get this to 100% before fully commiting, but I
>>> wanted to show you what failures look like.  Also, it is only
>>> auto-building my branch.  If we merge with trunk, I'll change it to
>>> build trunk.
>>>
>>> 2) Check out the "systemtest" builds in particular, and look at the
>>> PNG files.  This is running a flash application that tests playing
>>> back video files, and you get snapshots every 5 seconds.
>>>
>>> 3) Read through the documentation I posted above and let's iterate  
>>> on
>>> suggested changes to the system, documentation, or both.
>>>
>>> 4) Thijs has kindly volunteered to review the Flash code I checked  
>>> in,
>>> but others should feel free to do the same: svn/flash/trunk/selftest
>>>
>>> 5) Paul, any chance you could work with me to review what's in the
>>> Java server branch.  There aren't really any Java code changes, just
>>> build changes that are only executed if you call the new test  
>>> targets
>>> (see doc): svn/java/server/branches/aclarke_autotest/
>>>
>>> Once that's done, I'd like the team to make a "keep it or chuck  
>>> it" decision.
>>>
>>> Why?  Because this kind of framework can be useful if the team wants
>>> it, and can be REALLY ANNOYING if people don't.  Far better to not
>>> have this running if it's not useful, than running and spamming  
>>> people
>>> :)  Don't worry about insulting me if you think it's not worth it --
>>> I'd much rather know that.
>>>
>>> If folks decide it's good, and we iterate to agreement, then I'll  
>>> get
>>> it in the branch.
>>>
>>> Happy reading and I look forward to your feedback.
>>>
>>> - Art
>>>
>>> *: I also checked some code into svn/flash/selftest and
>>> svn/builds/remote/trunk/ per Thijs recommendations.  These are not
>>> branched, but are easily removed if we want to reject them.
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Red5devs mailing list
> Red5devs at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/red5devs_osflash.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/red5devs_osflash.org/attachments/20081016/6bdb76c4/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://osflash.org/pipermail/red5devs_osflash.org/attachments/20081016/6bdb76c4/attachment.bin