[Sandy] Official announment + New Wiki page :: versions (private for the moment)

[cornel]

hi

i will start to look at the stuff that doesnt worked as expected with
the 1.2 beta. should i post the bugs i find here or on the forum?
(small test programs available if needed).

while we're here, setBackSkin() doesnt work for me, that would be one bug.

best

cornel

On 15 Jun 2007 08:11:52 -0400, bruce at zeusprod.com <bruce at zeusprod.com> wrote:
> Yes, I think it should be considered a stable release, although admittedly
> not perfect. We should probably start a "known bugs/deficiencies" list so
> people are forewarned.
>
> Bruce
>
>
> kiroukou writes:
>
> > It is a 1.2 stable release for me.
> >
> > A zip on the forum with a dedicated topic, and a link from the wiki
> > to this forum would be enought for me ;)
> >
> > ++
> > Le 14 juin 07 à 22:33, Petit a écrit :
> >
> >> Hi Thomas/ Bruce!
> >>
> >> I haven't had time to test the latest 1.2 from the SVN extensively,
> >> but
> >> if you think it is stable
> >> and fairly feature complete, we should certainly launch it to replace
> >> the 1.2 beta 2 in the forum/download.
> >>
> >> I can create and plant the ZIP archive, but I think we should first
> >> agree on what to call that version.
> >> Is it a 1.2 beta 3 or is it a 1.2 release?
> >>
> >> In any case it should have its download post in the forum, and any
> >> wiki
> >> links pointing to download 1.2 should be changed.
> >> Or maybe it is sufficient to edit the 1.2 beta 2 post, to point to the
> >> new version.
> >>
> >> Best!
> >> /Petit
> >>
> >> bruce at zeusprod.com wrote:
> >>> I made a lot of updates to the wiki version page for Sandy 1.1,
> >>> 1.2, 2.0,
> >>> and 3.0. Please review it, as I'm not sure if I changed your
> >>> meaning on the
> >>> Sandy 2.0 and 3.0 pages regarding getters/setters and how they
> >>> changed the
> >>> use of the API.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I haven't listed the complete set of improvements, as many I can't
> >>> remember
> >>> or are minor.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> But I'll look at the svn log and make note of any major changes worth
> >>> highlighting.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Bruce
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thomas Pfeiffer writes:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Bruce, have you updated the 1.2 version page with the list of
> >>>> your improvment?
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Sandy mailing list
> >>> Sandy at osflash.org
> >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/sandy_osflash.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sandy mailing list
> >> Sandy at osflash.org
> >> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/sandy_osflash.org
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sandy mailing list
> > Sandy at osflash.org
> > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/sandy_osflash.org
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sandy mailing list
> Sandy at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/sandy_osflash.org
>