[screenweaver] Impressions of using SW with Xray
john grden
neoriley at gmail.com
Sun Aug 28 07:45:03 PDT 2005
Man, i've really been happy with the performance so far in using the SW
version of Xray.
1. After leaving Xray open all night, coming back, there's wasn't a huge
disk swap/reclaim of memory when I clicked on the dropdown or switched tabs.
Every time I leave the zinc version open like that, it takes a while to
reclaim the memory and get its act together. I came in this morning and
everything was as responsive (from what I could tell) as when I went to bed
last night. Which makes John a happy coder.
2. when running the SW version side by side with the Zinc version, there's a
noticeable difference in the flash redraw/performance. I don't know how to
really best put it other than, when I click tabs to go back and forth, the
SW version is much more pepy/fast than the zinc version. I had always
thought it was lethargic in the zinc wrapper, and now this confirms it.
Overall performance in SW seems to be much better.
So, with that, I'm going to go ahead and make a full SW version and put in
the hooks for resizing the stage etc and also convert my FLV player over to
see how that does (http://labs.blitzagency.com/?p=74)
excellent work guys, really REALLY am glad this is working out!!!
can't WAIT to get to the crossplatform stuff and get off of zinc.
--
John Grden - Blitz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: /pipermail/screenweaver_osflash.org/attachments/20050828/9fe1efde/attachment.htm
More information about the screenweaver
mailing list