[screenweaver] Screenweaver dot org web site

[Edwin van Rijkom]

Thank you for your contribution, Armand!

This sounds like a good moment to do a little poll, since we've ended up 
in the luxurious situtation where we can actually choose from 2 very 
nice designs!

1) Armands design, maintenance via Contribute
2) Helmuts design, Wiki/Blog based

Personally, I think (2) is closer in style to the things that are 
already there (doc's, forum, SW3 GUI) which I think is a good thing. I 
also like the idea that the Wiki/Blog solution can be fully open source 
based, so my personal preference is option (2).

Let me know what all of you think, so we can make a decision.

Cheers,
Edwin

Gaspy wrote:

> OK guys.
>
> I've worked 12 hours straight on it, drinking 4 large coffee cups in 
> the process. It's here. There's a complete site skeleton.
> I still believe that since only 3-4 will edit the site which is made 
> of 15 pages, even regular html and any editor will work. If we can 
> take a wiki and change it so that it looks like a regular site, it's 
> fine too.
>
> I made a print css for it so that the pages look good when printed. 
> Obviously not all styles are done, if you decide to go this route, 
> I'll have to make some styles for headings, side boxes, and so on. 
> Tested with IE6, Firefox and Opera, all on PC.
>
> So, this is my contribution to SWOS, enjoy:
> http://pub.mediadivision.com/swos
>
> Now it's your turn to decide; I don't mind if you reject my ideas, 
> I'll use the design somewhere else.
>
> Armand
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>screenweaver mailing list
>screenweaver at osflash.org
>http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/screenweaver_osflash.org
>  
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.5/178 - Release Date: 22-11-2005
>  
>