[screenweaver] New patch available [3.1.0.3]

[Muzak]

I tried renaming the .dll and then compiling no longer works.
Guess we'll have to wait for Thomas to wake up on his side of the planet ;-)

Thomas,
As for the UPX compression.
Builds faster (that's not really a surprise) and I get less "Build Failures".
I didn't have any problems with executables so far, so can't say I notice any difference with or without UPX.

regards,
Muzak

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Martijn de Visser" <martijn at martijndevisser.com>
To: <screenweaver at osflash.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: [screenweaver] New patch available [3.1.0.3]


> Thomas Wester wrote:
>
>> There is a new patch available at:
>> _http://screenweaver.org/downloads/screenweaver_builder_patch.rar_
>
> Terrific, thanks Thomas! I do have the same question as Muzak though -
> did you perhaps pack wrong DLL, or do we need to rename it?
>
>> Martijn, your stuff should work. The reason why
>> swSystem.Dialogs.browseForFile_Open did not work for you is because of a
>> typo. It should be swSystem.Dialogs.BrowseForFile_Open, note the capital
>> B for Browse.
>
> * /me slaps forehead and starts looking for a dark corner to hide * :-)
>
>> I am interested to see if UPX compression has any effect on the runtime
>> stability. Michael, have you been able to do more exhaustive tests
>> regarding this?
>
> I have been testing this as well (3 different projects) , but I have not
> found any differences in stability between compressed and uncompressed
> executables.
>
> cheers, Martijn.
> -- 
>
>
>     :: Martijn de Visser
>     :: www.martijndevisser.com
>