[screenweaver] new comer

[Edwin van Rijkom]

Welcome to the list Maddec.

No vector on SW4 yet. After the first proto was nearly finished, I 
decided I wanted to have things setup in a more modular way, so I 
started a big round of refactoring.

For the past week I haven't been able to work on it since I'm swamped 
with work for my studies (have to get my little 'Rascal' ActionScript2 
compiler in a presentable shape before friday, next week).

As for installers: my idea for SW4 is not to include an installer system 
at all since there's plenty of good OS install builders available out 
there (NSIS for example). The documentation will be mostly be a 
community effort, based on test and sample files.

Cheers,
Edwin

analogdesign wrote:

>Hi there,
>
>I've just suscribe this list lately.
>
>I'm an owner of an early SW2 licence and released numerous commercial apps
>with this marvellous software, I had to consider changing to another
>software because of the discontinuation of SW and the non-support of flash7,
>I regretted also the disparition of the outstanding forum support section.
>
>I'm very enthusiastic with the new OSSW project and enjoy being involved in
>this list (mainly on interface design and use issue). I wish you would
>continue the good job done before, also continue to put as much quality into
>the help files ;)
>I can see that some people who where at the origin of the project are still
>here ;)
>
>A: Do you know approximatly when you will release a pre-version of SW4?
>
>I'm looking forward for the crossplatform features, because it's the only
>way of doing viable commercial projects, the only concern I had with SW2, is
>the double coding necessary for the Macintosh version...
>
>I hope you will add in SW4:
>- the possiblity to generate a configurable installer automatically for each
>platform (to avoid playing the content from the cd-r each time)
>- a clear documentation mentionning which features are available for each
>platforms and which are dependant to one system.
>...
>
>B: about splash screen, my opininion is: if it's seems logical, it should be
>implemented by default, without adding one more exception, the less
>exceptions you add the wider audience you'll gain, isn't it?
>
>
>
>Best regards.
>
>Maddec
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>screenweaver mailing list
>screenweaver at osflash.org
>http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/screenweaver_osflash.org
>
>
>
>
>  
>