[swfmill] Small issue

AJ jackson1 at ut.ee
Tue Jul 5 05:05:24 PDT 2005


-dan seem to be on vacation :)
If you look closer on my post and -dan's reply
---cut START
  > It's almost same issue as:
  >        ...
  >       <Export>
  >         <symbols>
  >           <Symbol objectID="1" name="Symbol1"/>
  >         </symbols>
  >       </Export>
  >        ...
  >       <Export>
  >         <symbols>
  >           <Symbol objectID="2" name="Symbol2"/>
  >         </symbols>
  >       </Export>

yea, but i won't fix that. an optimizer/obfuscator can take care of that.
swfmill doesnt claim to produce overly compact SWFs ;)
---cut END

Then what's he talking is simple optimization of XML tags in swf's output when runing "swf2xml" function of swfmill.
The XML above could be compacted as follows:



  >       <Export>
  >         <symbols>
  >           <Symbol objectID="1" name="Symbol1"/>
  >           <Symbol objectID="2" name="Symbol2"/>
  >         </symbols>
  >       </Export>

AJ


Johannes Nel wrote:

>>swfmill doesnt claim to produce overly compact SWFs ;)
>>    
>>
>
>is this due to it not being gzip'd anymore nor is the repacking just
>not as optimal?
>
>  
>




More information about the swfmill mailing list