[swfmill] Small issue
AJ
jackson1 at ut.ee
Tue Jul 5 05:05:24 PDT 2005
-dan seem to be on vacation :)
If you look closer on my post and -dan's reply
---cut START
> It's almost same issue as:
> ...
> <Export>
> <symbols>
> <Symbol objectID="1" name="Symbol1"/>
> </symbols>
> </Export>
> ...
> <Export>
> <symbols>
> <Symbol objectID="2" name="Symbol2"/>
> </symbols>
> </Export>
yea, but i won't fix that. an optimizer/obfuscator can take care of that.
swfmill doesnt claim to produce overly compact SWFs ;)
---cut END
Then what's he talking is simple optimization of XML tags in swf's output when runing "swf2xml" function of swfmill.
The XML above could be compacted as follows:
> <Export>
> <symbols>
> <Symbol objectID="1" name="Symbol1"/>
> <Symbol objectID="2" name="Symbol2"/>
> </symbols>
> </Export>
AJ
Johannes Nel wrote:
>>swfmill doesnt claim to produce overly compact SWFs ;)
>>
>>
>
>is this due to it not being gzip'd anymore nor is the repacking just
>not as optimal?
>
>
>
More information about the swfmill
mailing list