[swfmill] Small issue

[daniel fischer]

Johannes Nel <johannes.nel at gmail.com> (on Tue, 5 Jul 2005 20:37:13 +0100):

  > sorry was on vacation  myself so did not read the whole thing. yeah i
  > had noticed that myself, but solved it with a bit of xslt.

just out of interest, are you running another xslt on the swfml-lowlevel?


  > i still
  > don't see why this should influence the size of the swf though (from
  > dan's statement - i will look at this a bit closer when i get ontop of
  > a months mail again)

well, if only one Export tag is used for exporting two symbols instead of using one each, it should save three bytes, the (swf-)tag header ;)


  > >   >       <Export>
  > >   >         <symbols>
  > >   >           <Symbol objectID="1" name="Symbol1"/>
  > >   >         </symbols>
  > >   >       </Export>
  > >   >        ...
  > >   >       <Export>
  > >   >         <symbols>
  > >   >           <Symbol objectID="2" name="Symbol2"/>
  > >   >         </symbols>
  > >   >       </Export>
  > > The XML above could be compacted as follows:
  > >   >       <Export>
  > >   >         <symbols>
  > >   >           <Symbol objectID="1" name="Symbol1"/>
  > >   >           <Symbol objectID="2" name="Symbol2"/>
  > >   >         </symbols>
  > >   >       </Export>

nice to see swfmill being used..
-dan

-- 
http://0xDF.com/
http://iterative.org/