[swx] Roadmap questions & suggestions

[ben]

Hi Aral,

I'd be happy to help - when times allows it - and I'm sure some other 
people would too.

This does require a central person to lead/manage the project somehow I 
think. Would you have time for that?

Ben

Aral Balkan wrote:
> Yep, svn is at http://svn1.cvsdude.com/osflash/swx
>
> I'm very happy to support such an effort.
>
> Aral
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 27 Apr 2008, at 10:49, ben <ben_da_dog at yahoo.co.uk 
> <mailto:ben_da_dog at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Aral,
>>
>> That's quite understandable.. turns out most people have a life 
>> outside of swx.. who would have guessed!? :)
>>
>> Is there anything out there for centralising any such development 
>> effort though, like an svn?
>>
>> also, has any development already been started by someone else?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Ben
>>
>> Aral Balkan wrote:
>>> Hi Ben,
>>>
>>> Dev on SWX has somewhat stalled. I just don't have time to work on 
>>> it at the moment (esp. On an AS3 version.)
>>>
>>> I hope someone or some people will step forward to contribute. 
>>>
>>> Aral
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 27 Apr 2008, at 02:38, ben <ben_da_dog at yahoo.co.uk 
>>> <mailto:ben_da_dog at yahoo.co.uk>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I was just wondering what the current status on development of swx was.
>>>>
>>>> Are there plans of a new AS2 release?
>>>>
>>>> If i may suggest one thing for a potential upcoming release, can 
>>>> swx.php be done without globals?
>>>>
>>>> All the swx code seems nicely organised in OO style (Validate 
>>>> class, Services_JSON class, SwxAssembler class, etc) but swx.php 
>>>> isn't as clean.
>>>> I personally don't mind as long as it work but I have been using 
>>>> CodeIgniter a lot in my SWX request and the latest version of CI 
>>>> (1.6) break the swx calls because it unsets all the globals when 
>>>> executed.
>>>>
>>>> After searching, I know I can override CI's behaviour by 
>>>> overloading its input class but I feel like I'm making something 
>>>> good like CI less good by doing so where I'd prefer to make 
>>>> something good like swx better.
>>>>
>>>> Can this "globals" issue be taken in consideration for future 
>>>> developments?
>>>>
>>>> Also, is there still plans for an AS3 version?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Ben
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> swx mailing list
>>>> swx at osflash.org <mailto:swx at osflash.org>
>>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swx_osflash.org
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swx mailing list
>>> swx at osflash.org <mailto:swx at osflash.org>
>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swx_osflash.org
>>>   
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swx mailing list
>> swx at osflash.org <mailto:swx at osflash.org>
>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swx_osflash.org
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> swx mailing list
> swx at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swx_osflash.org
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/swx_osflash.org/attachments/20080428/4f507b7f/attachment.html