[swx] Problem adding new service

[Nederflash (Folkert Hielema)]

Sorry if i sounded bad, i know that post as i commented on it ;)
It's a pitty we have done the same thing not knowing it of each other, 
that should be more community like i think to 1: Keep us busy doing new 
stuff and 2: Preventing us from doing the same thing like sort 
reinventing the wheels, while the wheels are there allready.

Anybody ideas on how we could accomplish more community share and 
postings to prevend this kind of dublicate work ?

Sorry Herdiansah for the noise,

Folkert Hielema

Herdiansah wrote:
> Yeah I did that Pownce service by my self by learning the Twitter 
> service :)
> I have post about Pownce service sometime ago and asking about the Post 
> A Link method and Post A File.
> http://osflash.org/pipermail/swx_osflash.org/2008-March/000174.html
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Herdiansah
> 
> 
> On Jun 19, 2008, at 1:18 PM, Nederflash (Folkert Hielema) wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for not leaving any copyrigths there, In 'your' Pownce class i
>> see only method name changes comparing it it with my Pownce class, the
>> rest is direct copy including comments ? If not you did a heck of a job
>> listing the methods with exact the same comments and lineup as mine had.
>> Not to be picky but it feels not all good ;)
>>
>> Folkert Hielema
>>
>> Herdiansah wrote:
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> I have a strange problem when adding new php file to swx service.
>>> Basically it's a Pownce service file that I copied then rename to Plurk
>>> service but when I open SWX Service Explorer and select Plurk it's not
>>> showing any method with text "Service does not contain any methods"
>>> instead of showing a list of method of pownce API.
>>>
>>> You could see the SWX Service Explorer
>>> here http://swx.dailyflashid.org/php/explorer/
>>> and the service file:
>>> Pownce: 
>>> http://swx.dailyflashid.org/php/services/_idvr/showsource.php?file=../Pownce.php 
>>>
>>> Plurk: 
>>> http://swx.dailyflashid.org/php/services/_idvr/showsource.php?file=../Plurk.php 
>>>
>>>
>>> it's just a different file name with the same method and also this
>>> problem exist on my local server also.
>>>