[xray] Logging Was: Where did the xray + mtasc tutorial go?

[John Grden]

I just wanted to clarify - if you send an object to xray's trace using the
original method and new ones, it will recurse the entire object - not just
show [Object object] ;)

I don't know if I missed the point here, but I wanted to be clear.

Also, xray always throws the trace to the IDE output so if you're compiling
with Flasc or the MM compiler, you can see it there without xray's interface

hth,
JPG


On 8/16/06, Chris Allen <mrchrisallen at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/16/06, Leif Wells <leif.wells at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I assume when you do a trace(log.DEBUG("My trace statement here")); that
> > Flash would output that to "Object object"? I only ask that because
> > sometimes a client may open up my source code in the Flash IDE and say
> > "these guys did a bunch of weird traces... but... whatever.
> >
>
> That's a really good point Leif. You are absolutely correct that it
> would output as [Object, object] in the IDE. I think that people will
> just have to weigh the options that are out there and pick the ones
> that best suit their needs. The good news is that we should still be
> able to get the Zeroi output to format properly and use the new
> features that will exist in the Xray interface soon.
>
> Having choices is a really great thing, and the Flash open source
> movement in certainly giving us some good ones.
>
> -Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> xray mailing list
> xray at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/xray_osflash.org
>



-- 
[  JPG  ]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/xray_osflash.org/attachments/20060816/a1ab18b7/attachment.htm