[xray] Recursive searches
Allen, Christopher S.
CSALLEN at PARTNERS.ORG
Wed Feb 1 14:05:33 EST 2006
I agree to. Blow it away. Be gone with it! No more recursive searches.
-----Original Message-----
From: xray-bounces at osflash.org [mailto:xray-bounces at osflash.org] On Behalf Of
Karina Steffens
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 12:53 PM
To: xray at osflash.org
Subject: Re: [xray] Recursive searches
I'm all for it, I'm sure you're surprised to hear ;) I believe that with the
new changes it has become obsolete. Also 8 out of 10 support requests seem to
have something to do with it...
K
________________________________
From: John Grden [mailto:neoriley at gmail.com]
Sent: 01 February 2006 14:35
To: xray at osflash.org
Subject: [xray] Recursive searches
I wanted to get the pulse of everyone here on using Recursive searches.
With the new enhancements to the tree and non-recursive searches, I
don't think there's much need for the recursive searches and I'm considering
refactoring ObjectViewer to not include it (save on file size, and clean it up
in general for new features).
I don't mind keeping it in there, but it IS the one feature out of all
of them that has taken the most time to maintain and develop. ObjectViewer
spans months in development time.
So, let me know what you think,
--
John Grden - Blitz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/xray_osflash.org/attachments/20060201/4617549c/attachment.htm
More information about the xray
mailing list