[xray] Recursive searches

[John Grden]

Ha, yeah, I guess it's time.  I'll consider removing it on the next release.

On 2/1/06, Allen, Christopher S. <CSALLEN at partners.org> wrote:
>
>  I agree to.  Blow it away. Be gone with it!  No more recursive searches.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* xray-bounces at osflash.org [mailto:xray-bounces at osflash.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Karina Steffens
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 01, 2006 12:53 PM
> *To:* xray at osflash.org
> *Subject:* Re: [xray] Recursive searches
>
>
>
> I'm all for it, I'm sure you're surprised to hear ;)  I believe that with
> the new changes it has become obsolete. Also 8 out of 10 support requests
> seem to have something to do with it...
>
>
>
> K
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* John Grden [mailto:neoriley at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 01 February 2006 14:35
> *To:* xray at osflash.org
> *Subject:* [xray] Recursive searches
>
> I wanted to get the pulse of everyone here on using Recursive searches.
>
> With the new enhancements to the tree and non-recursive searches, I don't
> think there's much need for the recursive searches and I'm considering
> refactoring ObjectViewer to not include it (save on file size, and clean it
> up in general for new features).
>
> I don't mind keeping it in there, but it IS the one feature out of all of
> them that has taken the most time to maintain and develop.  ObjectViewer
> spans months in development time.
>
> So, let me know what you think,
>
> --
> John Grden - Blitz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xray mailing list
> xray at osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/xray_osflash.org
>
>
>


--
John Grden - Blitz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://osflash.org/pipermail/xray_osflash.org/attachments/20060202/81797778/attachment.htm